New Jersey Should Review Certified Question of Law Rule

The Supreme Court of New Jersey recently granted certification in Larry Schwartz vs. Nicholas Menas, Esq. (No. A-54/55-20) (085184), in which the court will consider whether to finally abandon the “new business rule”, which categorically prohibits damages for the potential profits of a new business in most civil contracts and tort Actions.

Formerly an essential part of the law of appeals, this rule of in itself the exclusion of lost profits for new businesses from an award of damages has now been dropped by most other jurisdictions, in favor of an evidence-based inquiry to determine whether the plaintiff had proven damages “with reasonable certainty”. Although it may be more difficult for a plaintiff to establish such reasonable certainty with respect to a business with no profit history, the modern rule, and we believe the best, is to give the plaintiff a fair chance to persuade the investigator with relevant evidence, especially given the increased reliability and sophistication of expert economic projections.



This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third-party online distributors of ALM’s extensive collection of current and archived versions of legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law clients may access and use ALM content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

If you have any questions, call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]